Showing posts with label Wahid Institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wahid Institute. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

As Terrorism Takes on a New Face, the President Needs to Find His Backbone

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
OPINION
As Terrorism Takes on a New Face, the President Needs to Find His Backbone
Bramantyo Prijosusilo | April 26, 2011

The recent arrests of suspected terrorists reveal that our new generation of extremists has little contact with the older generations, who were radicalized and trained through direct experience and contact with international networks.

These new terror suspects, the police say, have more or less radicalized themselves relatively independently from the traditional connections to conflict areas in Central Asia or the Philippines. This new generation of suspects consists of individuals who studied in universities who radicalized themselves through jihadi Web sites and discussion forums on the Internet, and through the study of jihadi books and videos that are disseminated in Indonesia through the Internet.

In other words, this new breed of suspected terrorists is the fruit of the labors of such Web sites as arrahmah.com, almuhajirun.net and other active sites of various shades of Islamist fundamentalism and extremism. The proliferation of such sites, from the pseudo-intellectual offerings of the one managed by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia and bizarrely obnoxious sites such as that of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), to the Web site of the state-sponsored Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) means that we have no shortage of online material needed to radicalize a young man or woman and make them hate this country and the democratic, pluralist society we are developing here.

The fact that so many sites and organizations can actively incite hatred against our republic and against different groups in our society, to the point that they blatantly support the use of violence against the state and against fellow members of our society, testifies of the weakness of our government and our laws.

As a nation we have had traumatic experiences with the use of rubber-band laws that in the past were employed by the government to silence critics and dissenters, so we are cautious not to give the government too many powers that they can use against critics.

But when people like Sobri Lubis from the FPI scream at an audience of a religious gathering, urging them to kill Ahmadiyah followers, declaring that their blood is halal and that he will take responsibility for their killing, there should be legal ways to hold him to account — especially after we have seen that Ahmadiyah followers have been brutally killed by a mob reportedly affiliated with the FPI.

Sadly, our president has not the courage that this nation expects from its leaders, and he has even let the Islamist mobs go so far as threatening to bring about a revolution while at the same time calling the head of state vile names. Not only did these people get away with slandering the president and inciting murder, when these people demonstrated in front of the palace they were actually invited to come in for a chat!

It appears that Islamist fundamentalism in our country works on two fronts. The first hides under a cloak of legitimacy and steers away from appearing directly involved in violence but it actively preaches hatred against democracy, secularism, pluralism and religious liberalism. This group maintains a respectable image and has exponents in respectable institutions such as the MUI. These people a few years back began their offensive against secularism, pluralism and liberalism, by, among other things, defining pluralism as “the belief that all religions are the same.”

This apparently intentional misreading of pluralism is one of the bases of the argument that the MUI uses to declare that because secularism, liberalism and pluralism are threatening the basic tenets of Islam (such as the belief in the superiority of Shariah law), they are evil.

These evils, the MUI says, would lead people to follow manmade laws instead of Shariah. In other words the MUI is saying that our Constitution and our state are wrong and evil and we should adopt religious law instead.

What utter audacity from a state-sponsored institution that is also considered by graft watchdogs to be one of the most corrupt institutions in the country! Critics have also pointed out that the unconstitutional and uncivilized prosecution of the Ahmadiyah Muslims was also driven by the theological support of a fatwa by the MUI.

If the MUI declared liberal Islam as haram, then Rizieq Shihab on his FPI Web site has added a dose of vitriol to the brewing hate stew. According to him, liberal Islam is more satanic than Satan himself! So it comes as no surprise if some young university graduates who, wanting to contribute in the worldwide jihad to establish an Islamic caliphate that implements the one and only true Islam, should also learn how to make a bomb “in your mother’s kitchen” and package it in a book to send to one of the pioneers of the liberal Islam network here, the Democratic Party politician Ulil Abshar-Abdalla. That a poorly trained policeman lost his hand in the explosion that followed is further evidence of just how ill-prepared we are to rise up to the challenge of this new generation of terrorists.

To stop this deeply disturbing development in the recruitment of terrorists in our country, the president should demonstrate at least a minimum of firmness. Who would believe that we are a nation that fought a war of independence against the might of the Japanese, the British and the Dutch, considering all the meetings it took before any kind of military decision was taken in response to the kidnapping of our sailors by Somali pirates?

All throughout society people are talking about how fearful President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono is to take any position on any issue. Rumors are that he is held hostage by his political enemies and the skeletons in his cupboards. If this is true, he should be a patriot and step down, for this country deserves a president who can and will fight for the Constitution and protect its citizens. If it is not true then he should immediately make moves to erase the image of cowardice and rein in those who are attacking the foundations of our state, particularly as some of those are ministers in his cabinet.

The names that people have called the head of state, and the liberties taken in disregard of the Constitution, are attacks that cannot be left unpunished.

Bramantyo Prijosusilo is a writer, artist and broadcast journalist in East Java.

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe
URL: www.thejakartaglobe.com/opinion/as-terrorism.../437317

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

NU Leader Asks for a Return to Peace in Islam

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
NEWS
NU Leader Asks for a Return to Peace in Islam
April 20, 2011

The chairman of Nahdlatul Ulama, the country’s largest Islamic organization, on Tuesday repeated his call for Muslims to practice tolerance and peace.

“Islam means peace,” said KH Said Aqil Siradj, NU chairman. “Muslims might not reflect peace because of four factors: poverty, ignorance, Middle East-sponsored ideologies and incorrect interpretations of Islam.”

Speaking at a book discussion at the organization’s headquarters in Central Jakarta, Said Aqil said he lamented the fact that people had begun to forget the peaceful philosophy of Islam.

“In the 13 years the Prophet Muhammad spent in Mecca, he never declared war against those who practiced idolatry, nor did he order his men to destroy the statues.”

The idols were eventually destroyed when the people of Mecca converted to Islam.

“Muhammad, during his glory days, never declared Medina as an Islamic state. The word Medina means civilized,” Said Aqil said.

Said Aqil added that he was shocked by the suicide bomb at the Cirebon Police mosque last week. “NU has a well-established tradition in Cirebon, but that tradition was destroyed by a child last week,” he said.

Said Aqil also claimed that NU was under threat by Wahabi-funded foundations that dislike the traditional Islam of the group.

Yenny Wahid, the daughter of former president and NU senior figure Abdurrahman Wahid, said open discussion was needed to construct peace and reduce distrust among people.

“Without dialogue, there will be no knowledge, and our people can be easily provoked because they may not understand things,” she said.

Tuesday’s discussion was centered on a book published by Yenny’s Wahid Institute in collaboration with Buddhist organization Soka Gakkai titled “Dialogue on Civilizations for Tolerance and Peace.” The 309-page book recorded a 2-year correspondence between Abdurrahman and Buddhist leader and writer Daisaku Ikeda, and promotes a message of peace through continuous dialogue to bridge differences.

Meanwhile, dozens of members of the hard-line Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and Force of the Defenders of Islam (LPI) sealed an Ahmadiyah mosque in Pekanbaru, Riau.

“What we did was on behalf of Islam, FPI is at the front as the coordinator and we are ready to face anyone including the law,” said Feli Rizieq, coordinator of FPI Pekanbaru.

Ulma Haryanto & Antara

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe
URL: www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/nu-leader.../436400

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Banning Ahmadiyah not a solution: Yenny

HEADLINES
Wed, 03/02/2011
4:10 AM
Banning Ahmadiyah not a solution: Yenny
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Wahid Institute executive director Yenny Wahid said Tuesday that East Java Governor Soekarwo’s decision to ban the Ahmadiyah sect in her province was not an effective solution as plenty of other factors would need settling after that.

“After being dissolved and banned, what next? Oust Ahmadiyah followers from East Java? Then where will they go?” Yenny said after a discussion at the Wahid Institute in Jakarta.

She said there must be a more realistic solution in responding to the Ahmadiyah issue.

“Will they have to ask for asylum overseas?” Yenny added as quoted by Antara.

On Monday, the East Java governor issued a decree in Surabaya that prohibited all Ahmadis in Indonesia’s second most populous province from any kind of activities related to Ahmadiyah.

Yenny considered the ban that violates the Constitution, which guarantees all citizens can embrace their own beliefs without intervention from the government, as unacceptable.

Whatever Yenny’s objections are, however, calls for banning Ahmadiyah have continuously been echoed by various elements of Muslim society members.

In Jakarta, Islam Defenders Front (FPI) activists staged a rally Tuesday to demand the banning of Ahmadiyah teachings in Indonesia.

Earlier, a number of Islamic organizations and the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) in Banten had asked the government to ban Ahmadiyah in the province.

In Makassar, South Sulawesi, the Islam Congregation Forum, which groups 18 Islam organizations, urged the local administration to issue a decree on the Ahmadiyah banning.

The demand was aired in a mass rally in front of the provincial legislative council’s building. They claimed that the dissolution of Ahmadiyah was not negotiable as the sect was considered to have tainted the religion of Islam and had sparked unending conflicts.

— Indra Harsaputra and Andi Hajramurni contributed to this article from Surabaya and Makassar

Copyright © 2008 The Jakarta Post - PT Bina Media Tenggara. All Rights Reserved
URL: www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/03/02/banning...yenny.html

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

MUI’s edict contributed to anti-Ahmadiyah violence

NATIONAL
Tue, 02/08/2011
6:54 PM
MUI’s edict contributed to anti-Ahmadiyah violence
Mariel Grazella, The Jakarta Post
Wahid Institute director Yenny Zanuba Wahid says the Indonesian Ulema Council’s (MUI) edict that branded Ahmadis heretics has contributed to the violence committed against them.

The MUI issued an edict in 1980 saying Ahmadiyah was not part of the Muslim faith and that its followers were infidels. The council reissued the edict in 2005.

“I think [the edict] contributed to the violence,” Yenny said Tuesday.

According to Yenny, the MUI’s edict was used by certain groups to legitimate their actions.

A group of local residents attacked an Ahmadiyah congregation in Cikeusik, Banten, on Sunday. Three Ahmadis died in the violence.

“It provides legitimacy to easily provoked groups to cause destruction and even to commit murder,” she said.

Friday, December 31, 2010

2010 Review: Wave of Religious Intolerance Intensifies

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
NEWS
2010 Review: Wave of Religious Intolerance Intensifies
Dewi Kurniawati | December 30, 2010

Young people chant as an Ahmadiyah member's house is razed. (JG Photo)
Young people chant as an Ahmadiyah member’s house is razed. (JG Photo)
If one trend that emerged in the past year was considered more disturbing than others, it would be the apparent increase in fundamentalism and religious intolerance in a country that prides itself on being a bastion of pluralism.

It is hard to ignore. The increasing trend is evidenced by a constant stream of news reports of attacks against minority religious groups, as well as reports and surveys from various organizations.

The Setara Institute for Peace and Democracy recorded 28 attacks and violations of Christians’ right to worship in the first seven months of the year alone, up from 18 in all of 2009 and 17 in 2008.

In a separate report, the Wahid Institute said it had recorded 196 cases of violence based on intolerance and religious discrimination in 2010, an increase of almost 50 percent from a year earlier. The Moderate Muslim Society, on the other hand, says Indonesia saw at least 81 cases of interreligious conflict in 2010 — an increase of more than 30 percent from 2009.

“What we see today is an excess stemming from the repressive approach to religion during the Suharto era,” said Siti Musdah Mulia, a progressive Islamic scholar from the Indonesian Conference on Religion and Peace.

“Back then, when there was no freedom of speech, religious councils were established to coordinate all religious affairs.”

“Now that we have democracy, everyone wants to express his or her opinion. Unfortunately, many violated Pancasila and our constitution, and the government just turned a blind eye on it,” she added. “The government should forcefully implement the law against those groups. What we see lately is a process of human rights violations by omission.”

Blatant Attacks

It is not just the number of attacks and conflicts that are worrisome. It is also how emboldened the attackers seem to have become.

Members of the Ahmadiyah sect, for example, have been persecuted in the country for many years. Beginning in June, though, attacks against the group began occurring one after the other, the next one seemingly worse than the last.

In the capital, an Ahmadiyah mosque was firebombed. Then, in Bogor, a mob destroyed a mosque and several homes belonging to sect members.

An Ahmadiyah community in West Nusa Tenggara was also attacked in November and forced to leave its village.

The same trend was seen in conflicts involving Christians in the Greater Jakarta area. The shutdown of churches due to lack of necessary permits preceded violent attacks.

In September, Asia Sihombing and Rev. Luspida Simandjuntak, leaders of the Batak Christian Congregation (HKBP) in Bekasi, were stabbed and assaulted. Asia was stabbed and Luspida was be aten with a stick.

Thirteen defendants — including Murhali Barda, the suspended leader of the Islamic Defenders Front’s (FPI) Bekasi chapter — were indicted in court on Wednesday for a variety of charges, but the root of the problem remains.

Setara researcher Ismail Hasani had said earlier that the suburban regions of Jakarta — primarily Bekasi and Bogor, and even Depok and Tangerang — were seeing a radicalization phenomenon.

In June, a new group calling itself the Bekasi Islamic Presidium even announced plans for a road show aimed at persuading every mosque in the city to prepare for the possibility of “war” against “Christianization.”

Government Role

Equally — if not more — frustratingly for pluramism and rights advocates is the government’s response to the problem.

While President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has made a number of calls for pluralism to be upheld, those demands have failed to translate into action on the part of the government.

Religious Affairs Minister Suryadharma Ali, for instance, has re peatedly called for Ahmadiyah to disband, and he has shown support for the 1965 Law on Blasphemy that observers say has legitimized acts of violence against minority sects and groups.

The lack of change is also seen among law enforcement officers.

“A police officer once asked why I defended Ahmadiyah because he thinks Ahmadiyah is deviant. I told him that the police should protect them despite what they believe,” Siti said, pointing out that law enforcers should be neutral.

“It shows the lack of civic education in the recruitment process,” she added.

Suryadharma also supports the 2006 Joint Ministerial Decree on Houses of Worship, which requires the consent of the surrounding community for building churches, temples and mosques.

This has often been cited as the cause of the ongoing problem. In a majority Muslim country, a number of Christian congregations have encountered difficulty in getting consent from locals to build churches, forcing them to use houses or even vacant lots as venues for worship, which local governments say is illegal.

“Indonesians have witnessed an enormous process of mismanagement carried out by the government,” said Siti Zuhro, a political analyst from the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI).

During the iron-fisted rule of former President Suharto, he said, there was no tolerance shown for religious frictions, and any statements that had the potential to stir up social, religious and racial tensions were limited.

“Our democracy failed to create leaders that manage to protect all citizens. We only have rulers,” he said.

Rising Extremism

“I remember when President Yudhoyono held a state dinner during Obama’s visit. He repeatedly mentioned the country’s unity in diversity and pluralism,” said Siti Musdah, the chairwoman of the Indonesian Conference on Religion and Peace.

“Yudhoyono should be ashamed of himself with all these problems in the country.”

Adding insult to injury, the Indonesian Council of Ulema (MUI) said earlier this month that the proliferation of Santas, reindeer and twinkly lights in malls and public places had gone too far for the nation’s Muslim majority, claiming the decor had sparked complaints about Christmas overload.

“We have a serious problem with the powerless leadership that has no vision on how to keep this country united,” said Father Benny Susetyo of the Indonesian Bishops Conference.

“The state is absent in all of this chaos.”

Benny is worried that if the ongoing religious intolerance continues, Indonesia will become like Pakistan, where violence becomes part of daily life. “We may be shattered like the Soviet Union,” he said.

Another problem Benny highlighted was the moderate voices who have become a silent majority in the whole process.

“Moderate Indonesians should raise their voice and demand serious law enforcement by the state apparatus to crack down on these small, hard-line groups,” he said.

A survey released in September by the Center for the Study of Islam and Society found that among 1,200 adult Muslim men and women surveyed nationwide, 57.8 percent said they were against the construction of churches and other non-Muslim places of worship — the highest rate the study center has recorded since 2001. More than a quarter, 27.6 percent, said they minded if non-Muslims taught their children, up from 21.4 percent in 2008.

“Our education system has failed to instill the mentality to respect others whose views are different from ours. Even some elementary schools teach that people who think or live differently are enemies,” Siti said, demanding the government begin serious intervention on the issue. “Education is our only chance for the future.”

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Indonesia and Religious Violence

   August 11, 2010
Wall Street Journal, USA
Indonesia and Religious Violence
Arresting radicals like Abu Bakar Bashir is only half the battle.

Indonesia notched another big victory in the antiterror fight this week with the re-arrest of Abu Bakar Bashir, the al Qaeda-linked spiritual leader linked to the 2002 Bali bombings, as the Australian National University’s Greg Fealy explains on a nearby page. If only the country’s leaders would pursue Islamic vigilante groups just as aggressively.

Since Suharto fell in 1998, these thugs-for-hire have proliferated in the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country. The most prominent, the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), yearns for a Shariah state, and has been fingered for burning down Christian churches; attacking the Ahmadiyya, a minority Muslim sect; and beating up peaceful NGO activists. The latest misadventure came Sunday when goons beat up 20 Christians in Bekasi, West Java. (FPI denies involvement.)

Far from distancing themselves from this kind of behavior, public figures have recently started to court the group. Jakarta Governor Fauzi Bowo and Police Chief Timur Pradopo attended FPI’s 12th anniversary celebration Saturday, giving the group a taste of political legitimacy. The governor even invited FPI into the capital to police Muslims’ behavior during Ramadan, which began on Wednesday.

Thankfully, the majority of Indonesians are moderate and perceive the real threat FPI presents to their way of life and precious civil liberties. Twitter groups, editorial pages and NGOs erupted in protest over the Jakarta governor’s invitation. FPI head Habib Rizieq was forced to back down and pledged to let the police enforce Ramadan laws.

That’s all to the good. But what happens the next time FPI hooks arms with the police and local politicians? President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has voiced “concern” over violence against minorities, as he did after Sunday’s attack, but has largely bowed to the police to enforce the rule of law. Parliament has made similar noises. The result? As the Wahid Institute has chronicled, attacks are creeping upward, to 60 incidents last year from 55 in 2008. And that doesn’t even count attempts to impose Shariah through legislation, which has proliferated in recent years.

This cycle won’t be broken until President Yudhoyono exerts some leadership. This could be tough for a president who has tried to court the hardline Muslim vote since he first took office in 2004, from freezing the activities of the Ahmadiyya to enacting a radical antipornography law that limits free speech.

But as Yenny Wahid, the daughter of former president and respected cleric Abdurrahman Wahid, told us earlier this week, groups like FPI “carry the banner of Islam; therefore they act with impunity.” Surely that makes the violent FPI just as dangerous as men like Mr. Bashir.

 
^ Top of Page