Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

In-camera proceedings on Qadiani issue: speaker releases report

Business Recorder
Home » General News
In-camera proceedings on Qadiani issue: speaker releases report
November 15, 2011 | RECORDER REPORT

Business RecorderThe Federal Government Monday unveiled 37-year-old secret proceedings of joint sitting of the Parliament of 1974 that put Qadianis outside the pale of Islam.

The Speaker of the National Assembly released a 21-volume official report on the proceedings of the Special Committee of the whole House held in-camera to consider the Qadiani issue.

The first in-camera joint sitting was convened in 1974 by the then Prime Minister, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, to discuss the situation after anti-Qadiani riots.

Business Recorder already has published an exclusive story on August 19, 2011, informing its readers that the Federal Government may unveil 37-year-old secret proceedings of the Parliament.

Two volumes of this report are available with Business Recorder.

Well-placed sources in the National Assembly told Business Recorder that the House is likely to debate on the report.

The Sources said that only the Speaker of the National Assembly has the authority to declassify secret proceedings of the Parliament.

The outcome of the discussions of joint sitting of the Parliament in 1974 was the passage of the constitutional amendment Article 260(3)(b).“ A look on these documents shows arguments of various members including Chairman of the Special Committee of the Whole House, Sahibzada Farooq Ali.

A delegation of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed took part in the proceedings to answer queries.

Speaking on behalf of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, Mirza Nasir Ahmed gave answers to many questions from the members in the first sitting of the session.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011
URL: www.brecorder.com/general-news/single/599/172/1251267/

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Zia-ul-Haq made forgery in constitution: SC

ARY News, Pakistan
Pakistan
Zia-ul-Haq made forgery in constitution: SC
-
Updated :   Tuesday June 8, 2010  1:50:32 PM
-
Rashid Habib - ARY News

ISLAMABAD (Rashid Habib): Supreme Court Tuesday adjourned hearing of the petitions challenging various clauses of the 18th Constitutional Amendment till tomorrow.

Chief Justice during the hearing in his remarks said the change in the Objectives Resolution was criminal negligence and Gen. Zia-ul-Haq made forgery in the constitution under RPO. The restoration of the constitution is an achievement by this parliament.

A 17-member larger bench of the Supreme Court resumed hearing of the case this morning.

The Chief Justice remarked that the constitution is a sacred document and no person can forge this document. Zia-ul-Haq made forgery in the constitution under RPO and than assembly surprisingly didnt take notice of it. The words about religious liberties of the minorities were omitted from the constitution under RPO. The lawyer of the Bar Hamid Khan endorsing the remarks of the Chief Justice said than Assembly passed the amendment without taking notice of the omission and thus it had also committed negligence.

Earlier, in his arguments Hamid Khan said the mechanism of judicial commission for appointment of judges has been borrowed from South Africa, which has a presidential system of government.

The Bar counsel in his arguments before the bench said that in UK the Judicial Commission only appoints magistrates and a member of the parliament could not be taken in the judicial commission.

Chief Justice of Pakistan asked whether the Supreme Court has cancelled any amendment in such cases earlier? Hamid Khan said it has not happened earlier, however, the apex court is entitled to review and interprete it.

URL: www.thearynews.com/english/newsdetail.asp?nid=50131

“Objectives Resolution of 1949 misused intentionally”

Express Tribune, Pakistan
Pakistan
“Objectives Resolution of 1949 misused intentionally”
June 08, 2010

PML-N Chief Nawaz Sharif
The Supreme Court adjourned the 18th amendment hearing till tomorrow.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said that the Objectives Resolution of 1949 has been misused in the Constitution of 1973.

He said this during today’s hearing of petitions filed against the 18th amendment.

The chief justice said that in the past, parliaments in Pakistan have used legislation to render the Supreme Court’s decisions ineffective. He said the constitution has always been intentionally misused.

Senior lawyer Abdul Hafeez Pirzada sought a copy of the 1973 Constitution from the attorney general during the court proceedings today.

The attorney general assured about the provision of a parliamentary record of debate in the Supreme Court.

The hearing was adjourned till tomorrow.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

The next round [Editorial]

--Dawn.com, Pakistan
FROM THE PAPER > Editorial
The next round
Saturday, 10 Apr, 2010
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani spoke from the floor of the National Assembly on Thursday after the unanimous approval of the 18th Amendment package, and pledged: “We are not thinking of power, we are thinking about our future generations who could say that [the people’s] representatives of today have given a direction to the nation.”

The remarks were made in the context of suggesting that further constitutional reform is possible if support for those changes is developed. The prime minister did not specify what ‘improvements’ he had in mind, so let us suggest at least one: excising from the constitution the so-called Islamic clauses gratuitously inserted by Gen Zia and validated by the 8th Amendment.

Oddly, our parliamentarians didn’t see it fit to address even those of Gen Zia’s clauses that directly impact them: the qualification and disqualification criteria in articles 62 and 63 that have been infused with an ‘Islamic’ spirit. And stranger yet for a federal government formed by a coalition of the country’s most secular parties, the clause dealing with the prime minister’s election has been amended to make only Muslim members of the National Assembly eligible as candidates. True, the oath of office that the prime minister has to take (set out in the third schedule of the constitution) has always made clear that he/she has to be a Muslim and, realistically speaking, there is a remote chance of a non-Muslim candidate emerging for the prime minister’s slot. But it is an odd message to reinforce: don’t bother applying, you are second-class citizens. That is what the government seems to have told the country’s religious minorities.

Perhaps the government was afraid that visiting the Islamic clauses issue in this round of constitutional change would have made the whole package controversial and jeopardise the repeal of the 17th Amendment and the enhancement of provincial autonomy — the key demands as we speak. Going forward though this should be less of a concern. If it means taking on the fringe, ultra-conservative elements in politics and society, then so be it. There is something terribly peculiar about the argument that a military general who toppled a government and executed a prime minister before disfiguring the constitution drawn up by the country’s elected representatives could be introducing ‘God’s laws’ which by definition are sacrosanct and untouchable. Gen Zia exploited religion in the most cynical and destructive way possible to prolong his hold on power. Parliament must undo the legacy of Gen Zia, and to do so it must re-examine the Hudood and blasphemy laws too.

©2010 DAWN Media Group. All rights reserved
URL : www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-conte...he-next-round-040

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Islamic group gains power in Indonesia

- International Herald Tribune

By Peter Gelling
Published: October 7, 2008

JAKARTA: In a sign of its growing prominence, Indonesia’s Council of Ulemas moved its headquarters from the basement of a major mosque here into an expensive new office tower in the heart of downtown.



The council was established in 1975 as a quasi-governmental body of Muslim scholars by Suharto, the country’s leader for three decades, partly as a tool to keep politically minded Islamic organizations in check. But in the decade since the dictator’s fall, the group — whose leaders have increasingly espoused a radical form of Islam — has worked to establish itself as an assertive political force.

The group, known as MUI, built an impressive network of offices throughout the country, staffed by people who promote the council’s view of Islam. It logged its first major political success this summer when the government agreed to severely restrict the activities of a Muslim sect that does not believe that Muhammad was the last prophet.

Advocates of religious tolerance worry that the council’s new clout could signal the start of religious radicalization in a country known for its moderate brand of Islam.

“Islamists use the MUI as a major base of operations, coordinating support for the Islamist agenda,” said Holland Taylor, founder of LibForAll Foundation, an American and Indonesian nongovernmental group that promotes religious pluralism.

Among the goals of some prominent council members is the imposition of Shariah, or Islamic law, throughout traditionally secular Indonesia.

But other experts, even some concerned about the council’s conservative leanings and newfound influence, see the broader radicalization of Indonesian Islam as unlikely. They point out that Indonesia’s largest Islamic association, the Nahdlatul Ulama, promotes tolerance and religious pluralism and that Islamic political parties have struggled to gain ground in recent years.

Beyond that, broad antipornography legislation, which had been championed by the Council of Ulemas and its allies in Parliament, has been scaled back after a public backlash that included large street protests.

“I don’t think the Council of Ulemas is going to turn Indonesia into the Sudan,” said Sidney Jones, director of the International Crisis Group in Jakarta, citing “many other balancing forces.”

The council is an umbrella group that represents established Muslim organizations. In addition to advising the government on religious issues, it distributes fatwas, or religious directives, advising Muslims on how to practice their faith. Its fatwas are nonbinding.

Maruf Amin, the council’s deputy chairman, describes it as a moderate organization that represents the views of more than 60 Islamic groups in this overwhelmingly Muslim country.

“Our job is to communicate to the government the aspirations of Muslim people in Indonesia and to protect the Islamic population here from any bad influences that might lead them to deviate from their faith,” he said in an interview.

But some analysts who have studied the group say Islamic hard-liners have had an increasingly dominant role in the council in the last few years.

“The council has a long history of moderation, but lately it has been infiltrated by some hard-liners,” said Azyumardi Azra, director of the graduate school at Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University in Jakarta. “I have told its leaders that if they want to remain a representative organization, they need to be aware of this infiltration.”

The growing prominence of radical voices is partly a byproduct of the transition to democracy. Radical religious leaders who were often silenced during Suharto’s rule now have the freedom to propagate their views and have often proven adept at using the democratic system.

The growing relevance of the Council of Ulemas is partly a result of a budget some analysts believe is growing. (Neither the council nor the government would provide numbers.) Besides government financing, the council has sole authority to license halal food and medicine.

More recently, the council has tapped into Indonesia’s lucrative Islamic banking industry. It acts as one of several organizations overseeing banks that refuse loans to companies in businesses that run contrary to Islamic values, like those producing alcohol or selling pork.

These financing sources have allowed it to purchase its new office tower and to operate more than 150 satellite offices.

But analysts say the group has also benefited from its relationship with President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Although the president is considered moderate, he said last year that after the council issues any fatwas, “the tools of the state can do their duty.”

“Hopefully our cooperation will deepen in the future,” he said during the speech, according to translations by the International Crisis Group.

Some experts said they suspected he was supporting the Council of Ulemas to shore up Muslim backing in elections next year. A coalition of Islamic political parties backed him when he first ran for president in 2004.

The council’s biggest coup so far was Yudhoyono’s decision in June to restrict the practices of Ahmadiya, a minority Muslim sect.

The council had been calling for a ban on Ahmadiya since 2005 when it issued two fatwas, one against the sect for not believing Muhammad is the last prophet and another calling on Muslims to reject “pluralism, liberalism and secularism.”

On June 1 in Jakarta, opponents of Ahmadiya, some affiliated with Forum Umat Islam, an organization formed to promote the council’s fatwas whose leaders include several prominent council members, clashed with demonstrators supporting the sect. Dozens were injured.

Despite an outcry over the incident, the government ordered Ahmadiya members to “stop disseminating interpretations that deviate from the main tenets of Islam” or face legal action. The government then asked the Council of Ulemas, with its network of chapters, to monitor Ahmadiya’s compliance.

A report in July by the International Crisis Group, which analyzed the conditions leading to the decree, laid significant blame on the dominance of radicals within the council and the council’s growing influence.

Several of those members are leaders of groups blamed for burning mosques and houses belonging to Ahmadiya adherents.

In its annual report on religious freedom in September, the United Sates State Department singled out the Council of Ulemas as “influential in enabling official and social discrimination” against minority religious groups in the last year in Indonesia.

Still, most of Indonesia’s Muslims remain moderate, and some have begun to fight back.

Taylor, whose group promotes religious tolerance, said moderate groups would need to try to take control of the council or press the government to privatize or dissolve it.

URL: www.iht.com/articles/2008/10/07/asia/07indo.php
 
^ Top of Page