Showing posts with label Deden Sujana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deden Sujana. Show all posts

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Indonesia sect fears more attacks

Los Angeles Times
WORLD
Indonesia sect fears more attacks
Three members of the Ahmadiyah, a minority sect, were slain by Islamic hard-liners in February. Ahmadis fear the attackers' light sentences signal tacit government acceptance of religious violence.
Nurhayati, a member of the Ahmadiyah, a minority Islamic sect, and her child are among those seeking refuge at a safe house in Banten, Indonesia. (Dita Alangkara, Associated Press / September 3, 2011)
Nurhayati, a member of the Ahmadiyah, a minority Islamic sect, and her child are among those seeking refuge at a safe house in Banten, Indonesia. (Dita Alangkara, Associated Press / September 3, 2011)
By Kate Lamb, Los Angeles Times
September 3, 2011

Reporting from Jakarta, Indonesia— Arif Hakim recalls that deadly day in February when a thousand machete-wielding Islamic hard-liners descended upon his tiny congregation in rural West Java.

“I saw them coming, screaming that we were infidels and should be killed,” the 32-year-old welder said. “The police just watched and I panicked. I escaped and ran through the rice fields, but I could still hear the sounds of my friends being captured and [attacked].”

Three of Hakim’s fellow worshipers were killed in the melee. Their offense: They were members of a minority Islamic sect called Ahmadiyah, which has been under growing pressure by Islamic extremist groups.

The sect, which has adherents worldwide, is nonetheless banned in many Muslim countries because Ahmadis have divergent beliefs about the coming of the second messiah.

Across Indonesia, Ahmadiyah members have in recent years been the target of attacks, but the incident in the village of Cikeusik, West Java, stands out for both the level of violence and the fact that it was recorded on video.

The video, distributed worldwide on YouTube, shows a mob chanting religious slogans as they beat three Ahmadis to death with rocks, wooden clubs and machetes.

Many say the violence signals a dangerous wave of intolerance in the world’s most populous Muslim nation, one that had long prided itself on its acceptance of minority religious groups.

In recent years, harassment and attacks have been on the rise, with Christian groups, as well as Ahmadis, facing intimidation.

Many believe the attacks have come with tacit government acceptance in a nation where 200 million of the 237 million citizens are Muslim.

Bowing to political pressure, the Indonesian government in 2008 issued a decree calling on Ahmadiyah to “stop spreading interpretations and activities that deviate from the principal teachings of Islam.”

Although officials say the decree was intended to defuse religious tension, attacks against the minority group increased to 50 in 2010 from three in 2006, according to the Setara Institute, a nongovernmental group that monitors religious freedom.

The 12 men charged in the West Java deaths were sentenced to between three and six months in prison, court rulings that critics say give a virtual green light to the violent persecution of minorities.

Meanwhile, an Ahmadi man involved in the incident was sentenced to six months in prison, convicted of having provoked the violence because he called on fellow sect members to help defend Ahmadi property before the attack.

“I think the verdicts were appalling and underscore an image that the Indonesian government is going to have to confront, which is of a place of growing intolerance,” said Sidney Jones, a political analyst with the International Crisis Group.

The U.S. State Department has also criticized the sentencing of the Ahmadi man.

Islamic hard-liners, on the other hand, continue to defend their anti-Ahmadiyah campaign. A group called the Islamic Defenders Front, or FPI, which has previously attacked brothels, nightclubs and the editor of Indonesian Playboy, denies that it was involved in the West Java incident but says Ahmadiyah must go.

“Ahmadiyah is not Islam; they are an insult to Islam,” said the group’s Jakarta leader, Habib Salim Alatas, wearing a yellow sarong and heavy eyeliner, seated in a living room lined with portraits of stern-faced imams. “It is like a religion for rats.”

On Aug. 16, the eve of Indonesia’s Independence Day, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono defended the country’s pluralistic reputation against growing criticism at home and abroad. But many Ahmadiyah followers are not reassured.

“People attack Ahmadi homes, their children are bullied in school, their businesses are boycotted and others are injured. I think it is a scary life,” says Firdaus Mubarik.

Ahmadiyah, which originated in India in the 19th century, has 200,000 followers in Indonesia. Many who fled Cikeusik after the attack are afraid to return. On Lombok island, the 138 members of another group of Ahmadis have lived in a shelter for six years since an attack there.

Hakim, the Cikeusik welder who sought refuge in a neighboring village but was later interrogated and beaten by a second knife-wielding mob, worries about a similar fate.

“I thought that would be the end of my life,” he said, sitting under a fuchsia bougainvillea tree at the entrance of a Jakarta mosque. But “I am trying to think the incident is not the scariest thing in my life, but the sweetest because I still live.”

Lamb is a special correspondent.

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times
URL: www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-indonesia...story

Friday, September 2, 2011

Ahmadi Victim Recalls Cikeusik Mob Attack, Says Threats Continue in Jail

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
NEWS
Ahmadi Victim Recalls Cikeusik Mob Attack, Says Threats Continue in Jail
Chrestella Tan | September 02, 2011

Deden Sujana, head of security for the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) during his trial at Serang District Court. (Antara Photo/Asep Fathulrahman)
Deden Sujana, head of security for the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) during his trial at Serang District Court. (Antara Photo/Asep Fathulrahman)
For months Deden Sujana had to be treated in a Jakarta hospital. He was put on life support as doctors raced to save his right hand, which was nearly severed during a deadly attack on members of the Muslim minority sect Ahmadiyah in February.

Now in jail for provoking the attack and still facing intimidation, Deden told the Jakarta Globe in an interview on Thursday that when a mob of 1,500 descended upon an Ahmadi’s house in Cikeusik, Banten, he was prepared to die.

“Let’s die together,” Deden said, recalling the words he told an Ahmadi friend as the two were lying on the ground bleeding, while men armed with machetes, bamboo sticks and rocks continued to beat their ailing bodies.

“I was stabbed in the chest,” he said, adding that the blade just missed his heart. “Doctors said I should have been dead. It is a miracle of God that I am still alive.”

Deden’s wrist was slashed by a machete when he was trying to protect his head during the attack. There is now a long scar encircling it. Although doctors managed to reattach Deden’s hand, he has lost feeling in most parts of it.

He said his hand would never fully recover. Only his thumb and index finger are still functioning properly, and he regularly feels intense pain.

When asked who attacked him, Deden said: “I remember, it was Idris.”

He was referring to Idris bin Mahdani, who in August was sentenced to five and a half months in prison for possession of a machete, but not for attacking Deden. Just weeks after his conviction, Idris was released.

Instead, the Serang District Court put the blame for the attack on Deden, claiming he refused to vacate the building and thereby provoked the assault that left three Ahmadis dead. Last month, Deden received a harsher penalty than Idris: six months in jail.

Deden has refused to lodge an appeal, however, saying that with just two months before his release, the legal move would be useless. There was also concern that his appeal would only cause more controversy and lead to more hatred of Ahmadis, who have already suffered more than 160 attacks across the country over the last decade.

Kiagus Ahmad, Deden’s lawyer from the Jakarta Legal Aid Foundation (LBH Jakarta), said he respected his client’s decision, but there was a downside.

“Deden’s decision is setting a bad precedent. If every victim like him does the same thing, people will think that it is OK for [victims] to be criminalized,” he said. He added that Deden’s decision in the long run could further endanger minority groups.

Deden said he was concerned about the threats and intimidation he continued to face, even behind bars.

Since his trial began last month, Deden said several people claiming to represent the local administration had approached him before trial sessions. They said he could have his charges dropped or given a lenient sentence if he renounced his faith as an Ahmadi.

Prison officials now keep a close eye on Deden, who faces insults and intimidation from the rest of the prison population.

“There are many people — inside and outside this jail — who want me dead,” he said.

“The hardest intimidation came from Serang Police,” Deden added, referring to the deputy chief of Serang City Police, Adj. Comr. Jajang.

He would not specify the intimidation allegedly carried out.

The chief of Serang District Police, Adj. Sr. Comr. Krisnandi, challenged Deden to come up with evidence. “What Deden has said about the intimidation was not credible. Nobody has been able to show us there was truth to the claims,” Krisnandi said.

Kiagus maintained that the intimidation proved that law enforcers have been biased in their treatment of the minority group, which mainstream Muslim organizations deem deviant.

Andreas Harsono, an Indonesian consultant for New York-based Human Rights Watch, urged the police and the National Police Commission to investigate Deden’s statement about the attack by Idris as well as his claims of harassment and intimidation by police officials.

Andreas reiterated that the court had not been fair toward Ahmadiyah. The HRW consultant highlighted the court’s refusal to put the survivors of the attack on the witness stand.

“There were many irregularities in the Cikeusik trial, but it’s Deden Sujana’s choice to appeal or not to appeal. He needed to consider the possibility of a higher sentence on appeal. He has his family to be with,” Andreas said.

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe
URL: www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/ahmadi-victim.../462886

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Freedom Elusive for Religious Minorities

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
HOME
Freedom Elusive for Religious Minorities
Ulma Haryanto | August 18, 2011

For Firdaus Mubarik, an Indonesian Ahmadiyah activist, Independence Day provides no cause for celebration.

“For me and my family, there is no Independence Day this year,” Firdaus said on Wednesday. “I don’t want to hear people talking about it or to watch celebrations, because I know my brothers are not free at all. Many more live in fear all across Indonesia.”

Firdaus referred to Deden Sudjana and Ahmad Nuryamin, who were sent to prison for defending their community from mob attacks. Deden was found guilty of violent assault and disobeying police officers during an anti-Ahmadiyah protest in Cikeusik, Banten, in February. Three Ahmadis were killed in the attack.

“I take it as a new experience. Now I know what it is like to be an inmate,” Deden said in a phone interview. “I also see this place as a temporary retreat.”

Deden is expected to be released in November, if he accepts the court’s ruling. “I decided to appeal. I haven’t given up my hope of seeking justice,” he said.

Ahmad, from Cisalada, Bogor, received an 18-month sentence for stabbing an attacker in self-defense in October 2010. In that incident, a group of 200 people attacked his village, looting and burning homes.

Ahmad admitted to carrying a knife, but he said he panicked and did not remember stabbing one of the teenagers who set an Ahmadiyah mosque on fire.

Ahmad was originally sentenced to nine months by the Cibinong district court, but he saw his jail term increased after appealing to the West Java High Court.

Meanwhile, Bona Sigalingging from the GKI Yasmin church in Bogor reflected on the congregation’s second year of having to pray on the roadside, because its church was still sealed by the city government.

“Our independence is still something to be thankful for. We feel that the current injustice is more reason for us to stand up and fight,” he said. The congregation church has held its Sunday services on the pavement since last April.

For Yap Sungkono, a Falun Gong practitioner, not being legally accepted as an official organization does not mean he cannot celebrate Independence Day.

“The group has a marching band and we were invited to perform today at the National Archives Building,” Yap said. Outlawed in China, Falun Gong activists are trying to make a new home in Indonesia.

The government has refused to recognize Falun Gong has a legal organization, though, based on input from the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Justice and Religious Affairs, as well as the National Police and the State Intelligence Agency (BIN).

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe
URL: www.thejakartaglobe.com/home/freedom-elusive.../459861

As We Reflect on Independence Day, Can We Honesty Say We Are Free?

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
OPINION
As We Reflect on Independence Day, Can We Honesty Say We Are Free?
Tasa Nugraza Barley | August 18, 2011

Celebrating this 66th independence day, there’s one question every Indonesian needs to ask themselves: Do they have the independence they deserve?

Although this nation gained its independence a long time ago, through long, bloody wars against the Dutch occupation, it wasn’t until 1998 that we really could say whatever we wanted to say. Although many think Suharto was able to improve our economy greatly, the fact that his 32-year dictatorship oppressed us politically and culturally was not debatable. It was simply another kind of occupation.

But is it right to claim that conditions are so much better now? Is everyone finally enjoying the independence in this country?

Sadly, I don’t think so.

As we’ve been practicing democracy for more than a decade, it may be a valid claim that we finally have the political right that we never had in the past. If there are things that go wrong, people can easily criticize the government or lawmakers, an act that would send someone to jail during Suharto’s regime.

Even though this nation may be a role model of democracy in the region, by providing its people the independence to speak freely and criticize, Indonesians still don’t have their independence in many other areas.

Countless times, the president and his ministers have announced how our economy has been improving very significantly. It’s true that Indonesia’s economic growth looks very confident — it is now predicted to reach 6.6 percent, surpassing the government official target of 6.5 percent — and is stubbornly unaffected by the downfall of American and European economies.

Looking from this perspective, it’s easy to say that the government has successfully improved the prosperity of the people. But as shown by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) in early July, there are still 30 million poor people in Indonesia, a slight improvement from last year’s number, 31 million. Is it just me, or are the rich getting richer and the poor, well, staying very poor?

As has been revealed through a number of corruption cases — the most high-profile involving the likes of Gayus Tambunan, Susno Duadji and now Muhammad Nazaruddin — the justice system is controlled by little other than power and money.

People were clearly hurt to find out that former tax man Gayus could miraculously travel to Bali, Singapore, Macau and Hong Kong while supposedly in police detention during his graft trial.

The Gayus case clearly made us understand even better than before how justice can still be bought in this country. As long as you have money, the chances are you can fix things here and there, whether you’re right or wrong.

The public is watching another political circus show, with Democratic lawmaker Nazaruddin as its main star. Not only is he alleged to have a key role in the Southeast Asian Games graft scandal, but the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has also stated that the disgraced politician is also involved in other corruption cases, worth more than a staggering Rp 6 trillion ($700 million) in total.

Looking at the amount of money involved, if true, Nazaruddin could not have done this by himself; many other politicians and government officials must have played a role in the scandal.

But based on previous corruption cases, my hunch tells me that only a few will be sacrificed, while many others will walk free as if nothing has happened.

And this is all happening when a poor man can easily spend months, or even years, in jail just for stealing a pair of slippers from the mosque or a chicken from his neighbor’s house.

Try to talk about independence to those in the Ahmadiyah sect, a religious minority group whose 500,000 members are receiving threats all over the country. Among many of these incidents, one stands out. In February, Ahmadiyah members in Cikeusik, West Java, were attacked by a 1,500-strong mob who wanted to kick them out from the village. Three Ahmadis died.

A court has now jailed 12 members of the Sunni Muslim mob for, at most, just six months each, although they were caught on film violently attacking Ahmadiyah members in clear sight of police officers. As if this was not weird enough, the same court this week jailed one of the Ahmadiyah survivors for six months. Deden Sudjana, the Ahmadiyah member, afterwards bitterly questioned why he had been treated the same as — or even worse than — the people who had murdered his three friends.

When he asked “Where is the justice?” what he was essentially saying was that he and many other minority counterparts did not have the privilege to enjoy this country’s independence. Believing in whatever god and religion you wish to is supposed to be a basic right here, yet Deden and his friends cannot do this.

If our founding fathers and national heroes could come back and see all this, I’m sure they would cry. They would be shocked to see how their noble values have been stamped on by today’s leaders in the interests of people’s egos.

When our heroes bravely fought for independence, all they wanted to do was ensure that their grandchildren could live freely, happily and prosperously. To achieve that goal, they did not mind having a humble life.

But look at us now, we’ve become a shameless nation whose “independence” seems to be nothing but a rhetorical term in the history books.

Ahmadis to drop further legal proceedings in Cikeusik killings

Jakarta Post, Indonesia
NATIONALTue, 04/19/2011 10:29 PM
Ahmadis to drop further legal proceedings in Cikeusik killings
The Jakarta Post
The Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregration (JAI) says it will not seek further legal action against the hard-liners given lenient sentences for instigating a riot in which three Ahmadis were beaten to death.

The JAI, a repeated target of violence by Muslim hard-liners who accuse it of straying from Islam, said that the Ciekusik riot case was over.

“The families of the victims have forgiven all the attackers. They are fine now,” JAI spokesman Zafrullah A. Pontoh said. “We deeply regret that we had to lose three of our members. But we will not prolong the conflict by reporting the murder cases,” he added.

However, the incident would not deter the group from practicing or defending their beliefs, he said.

Several legal experts have suggested that the Ahmadis file another report following the Serang District Court’s decision to sentence 12 hard-liners to jail for terms ranging from three to six months for involvement in the attack.

The same court sent Deden Darmawan Sudjana, an Ahmadi man who was critically injured in the attack, to prison for six months for defying an order to leave the area where the mob was ready to ransack the assets of Ahmadi community members.

Human rights activists, foreign governments and legal experts have agreed that the verdicts were unfair.

Criminal law expert Yesmil Anwar of Padjajaran University in Bandung, West Java, said that the trials should not have ended with such light sentences. “We cannot merely say it was an unanticipated tragedy. Indonesia is a state of laws. All crimes, regardless of whether they are committed intentionally or unintentionally, should be investigated fairly,” he said.

Yesmil said that the outcome of the legal proceedings was partisan and unfair to the Ahmadis. “The ultimate goal of the judicial system should be justice for victims.”

Yesmil said the Ahmadis should continue to fight. “File a new case that focuses on the murder of its three members,” he said. “If the Ahmadis file a report for murder, the police should respond by holding an investigation. All of us can keep our eyes on the investigation to make sure the police do their job.”

Yesmil also questioned the judges’ decision to sentence Deden under article 212 of the Criminal Code for acting against the state, which was not part of the indictment submitted by prosecutors. Deden had only been charged with physical abuse and inciting hatred.

“The judges’ decision has gone too far away from the real point of the case,” he said.

Another criminal law expert, Eddy S. Hiariej of Yogyakarta-based Gadjah Mada University, said it was not usual for judges to expand upon the indictment submitted by prosecutors. “Judges determine the sentence based on the prosecutors’ demand. In this case, the judges considered another charge,” he said.

However, Eddy said, the practice, while uncommon, was allowed. “The judges can do so if they see another violation of the law,” he said.

Hasril Hartanto, a criminal law expert from the University of Indonesia in Depok, likened the sentence to a compromise. “The prosecutors saw their priorities as stabilizing the social situation first, then justice,” he said.

“Prosecutors might have faced an unpleasant situation if they supported the Ahmadis. For the sake of social security, they chose to make the minority suffer,” he said.

On Tuesday, activists from various organizations, including the Indonesia Legal Aid Institution Foundation, the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute, Kontras, Imparsial, Elsam, and the Human Rights Working Group, issued a statement condemning Deden’s sentence. “We criticize law enforcement’s unwillingness to pursue the case fairly for the minority Ahmadi,” Kiagus Ahmad Bella Sati of the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute said. Ahmad, who also represented Deden, said he activists demanded that the Court Commission investigate prosecutors in the case.

Copyright © 2008 The Jakarta Post - PT Bina Media Tenggara. All Rights Reserved
URL: www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/08/18/ahmadis-drop-further-legal-proceedings-cikeusik-killings.html

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Indonesia sentencing sets dangerous precedent

Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat International
16th August 2011
PRESS RELEASE
Indonesia sentencing sets dangerous precedent
Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat condemns unjust imprisonment of Ahmadi Muslim in Indonesia

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat condemns in the very strongest terms the sentencing of Mr Deden Sudjana to six months imprisonment by a District Court in Indonesia.

In February Mr Sudjana was one of the many victims of a brutal assault by a mob of over 1,000 people that shocked the entire world. During the attack 3 Ahmadi Muslims were martyred in the most vicious and brutal way imaginable.

Only 12 of the perpetrators of the February attack were charged by the police and each received very negligible sentences. On the other hand Mr Sudjana, who did nothing but defend himself, his fellow Ahmadi Muslims and their mosque has been sentenced to six months imprisonment.

The Press Secretary of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat, Abid Khan said:

“The sentencing of Deden Sudjana to six months imprisonment is an affront to all forms of decency. It is clearly a travesty of justice. Rightly this decision has been condemned by media and human rights agencies across the world.

Let it be absolutely clear that neither Deden Sudjana nor any other Ahmadi Muslim provoked in any way the brutal assault in Banten that took place last February. That attack was caused only by the fanaticism and cruelty of over a thousand extremists determined to see the blood of innocent and peace loving Ahmadi Muslims.

This decision sets an extremely dangerous precedent, whereby the Courts have taken away the right of an Ahmadi Muslim to defend himself or his property even when faced with a violent and brutal assault, whilst on the other hand it gives a free hand to extremists to continue their wave of attacks against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat in Indonesia.”

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat hereby seeks the release of Deden Sudjana immediately and requests the international community to take urgent notice of this case.

Furthermore, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat condemns in the strongest terms another attack on one of its mosques in South Sulawesi on Sunday.

22 Deer Park Road, London, SW19 3TL UK
Tel/Fax: 020 8544 7613 Mob: 077954 90682
Email: press @ ahmadiyya.org.uk
Press Secretary AMJ International

Curious Justice in Banten

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
OPINION
Curious Justice in Banten
A. Lin Neumann | August 16, 2011

People in Medan protesting against violence in the name of religion and urging the government to act against those behind the anti-Ahmadiyah violence in Cikeusik earlier this year. (Antara File Photo)
People in Medan protesting against violence in the name of religion and urging the government to act against those behind the anti-Ahmadiyah violence in Cikeusik earlier this year. (Antara File Photo)
Almost exactly one year ago, Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said the following on the occasion of Independence Day: “I want to underline the importance of maintaining and strengthening our brotherhood, harmony and tolerance as a nation… In everyday life, we still find cases that don’t reflect the harmony, tolerance and mutual respect … related to religion, ethnicity, tribe and regions. We must not ignore such a situation.”

I guess no one was listening. Monday’s court verdict finding the victim guilty of inciting the mob that nearly took off his arm with a machete and killed three fellow members of the Ahmadiyah sect last February, set a new low for justice.

The district court in Banten province found Deden Sujana at fault because he was one of a handful of Ahmadiyah members who attempted to stop a crowd of about 1,500 people as it attacked the house where they were staying. By the logic of the court, if Deden had fled the area nothing would have happened and his three friends would not have been beaten and hacked to death. By such reasoning, banks should be robbed because they have money in them and pedestrians are only killed by runaway drivers because they are walking on the street.

Deden’s crime was being there. And for that he was given a six month sentence. On July 28, the same court gave 12 men involved in the violence, including the leader of the mob, sentences of three to six months for carrying out the attacks, which millions have seen on YouTube.

“I, the victim, am sentenced in a trial held under political pressure,” Deden told the court Monday, noting that he was also convicted of violent assault, a crime he was not even charged with. “I was treated the same way as the uncivilized murderers of my three friends. Where is the justice?”

The strange thing is, the sentence was neither a surprise nor an aberration.

Just days after the Feb. 6 attack in the village of Cikeusik, National Police Chief Gen. Timur Pradopo told a hearing in the House of Representatives that Deden, who was then head of security for Ahmadiyah in Jakarta, was responsible for the violence because he had gone to the village to occupy a house owned by the sect, fearing that it would be ransacked if left abandoned. “That’s why the mob got out of control and the fatalities occurred on the Ahmadiyah side,” the police chief said at the time.

In that same hearing, Religious Affairs Minister Suryadharma Ali defended a 2008 joint ministerial decree that restricts the Ahmadiyah’s activities and bans Ahmadis from spreading their faith. The decree, which is frequently cited by those who attack the sect for being heretical to Islam, is really there to help Ahmadiyah, the minister said. “The decree was not made to discriminate against certain groups, it was aimed at maintaining religious harmony, including protecting the Ahmadiyah.”

Last year, Suryadharma called for outlawing Ahmadiyah altogether. “To ban [the Ahmadiyah] is far better than to let them be… To outlaw them would mean that we are working hard to stop deviant acts from continuing,” he said.

So it is in this upside down world where victims are criminals and intolerance is cited in defense of minorities.

It should surprise no one that a day before Deden was found guilty a gang of thugs under the banner of the Islamic Defenders Front attacked an Ahmadiyah mosque in Makassar. Hardly anyone noticed since this time no one was killed and such assaults are by now routine.

Predictably, Monday’s outrage has been denounced by foreign governments and human rights groups as a sign that despite Indonesia’s booming economy it seemingly has no coherent rule of law. But will it also occasion official denunciations at home and a spirited and courageous defense of tolerance and secular freedom? Not likely.

Precious few political leaders ever speak out in defense of tolerance and the constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom. Eva Sundari, a PDI-P lawmaker who has made defending minorities one of the hallmarks of her work, told me last week that she finds it almost impossible to recruit allies in the House. “Christians are afraid of speaking out, because they are a minority,” she said. And progressive Muslims are afraid to speak out because they do not want to be accused of attacking Islam.

And so the stain of lawlessness and bigotry grows.

Still, one can hope. “It would be so nice if something made sense for a change,” the title character says in the classic Alice in Wonderland.

Yes, it would be so nice.

A. Lin Neumann is a senior adviser to the Jakarta Globe.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Indonesia jails man who fought off mob attackers

Bangkok Post
News > Asia
Indonesia jails man who fought off mob attackers
Published: 15/08/2011 at 03:32 PM

A video grab shows villagers attacking members of the minority Ahmadiyah Islamic sect in Pandeglang, Banten province, on February 6, 2011. Disturbing video emerged February 7 of a bloody religious mob attack in Indonesia that killed three members of a minority Muslim sect, showing extremists beating their victims to death. One member of the sect has been jailed for 6 months for defending himself.
A video grab shows villagers attacking members of the minority Ahmadiyah Islamic sect in Pandeglang, Banten province, on February 6, 2011. Disturbing video emerged February 7 of a bloody religious mob attack in Indonesia that killed three members of a minority Muslim sect, showing extremists beating their victims to death. One member of the sect has been jailed for 6 months for defending himself.
An Indonesian court on Monday jailed a minority sect member for six months for defending himself and others from a lynch mob that killed three of his friends earlier this year.

The sentence was the same or stiffer than those handed out last month to 12 Islamic extremists who led the mob in the February rampage, including a teenager who was filmed crushing one victim’s head with a stone.

Human rights activists expressed outrage that one of those wounded by the mob should be jailed for longer than the leaders of the violence.

A panel of judges found Ahmadiyah sect member Deden Sudjana guilty of ill-treatment and ignoring an order to evacuate the sect’s property in Cikeusik, western Java, as the armed mob arrived.

“The defendant failed to act following the police order to evacuate,” one of the judges told Serang district court.

“Video footage shows the defendant started punching a man with a black jacket,” the judge added.

Wearing a traditional batik shirt, the 48-year old defendant heard the sentence in stunned silence. Later he told AFP he was “disappointed” with the ruling.

“It’s embarrassing. I’m purely a victim who has been criminalised in my own country,” he told AFP.

“There was no police order to evacuate and I hit the man because he entered our house of worship, calling us infidels, and ordered people to kill us. Isn’t it normal that I hit the man as an act of self-defense?“

Human Rights Watch deputy Asia director Elaine Pearson said: “The inconsistency between the trials of those who killed the Ahmadiyah and the trial of Deden Sudjana is appalling and smacks of injustice.

“Those responsible for the deaths of three Ahmadis got three to six months, and Sudjana also got six months – seems like the Ahmadiyah face blatant discrimination not just from Islamic militant mobs, but also from an Indonesian court.”

One of the mob, members of Indonesia’s majority Sunni sect, almost severed Sudjana’s left hand with a machete during the February 6 onslaught, which pitted about 20 Ahmadiyah followers against around 1,500 enraged fanatics.

A secretly filmed video of the Cikeusik rampage sparked international concern when it appeared online within days of the attack.

The footage shows police fleeing the scene as the mob – armed with machetes and knives and shouting abuse at the “infidels” – launched their attack.

A handful of Ahmadiyah men tried to defend the property with stones and slingshots but were quickly overwhelmed.

Indonesia Ahmadiyah attack: Outrage over victim jailing

Asia-Pac
15 August 2011 Last updated at 09:07 GMT
Indonesia Ahmadiyah attack: Outrage over victim jailing

Deden Sudjana, who was injured by a machete in the attack, said the verdict was embarrassing
Deden Sudjana, who was injured by a machete in the attack, said the verdict was embarrassing
Rights groups have expressed outrage after an Indonesian court jailed a Muslim sect member for defending himself from a brutal mob attack.

The court jailed Ahmadiyah member Deden Sudjana for six months, a heavier term than many of the attackers received.

Three Ahmadiyah members were bludgeoned to death in an attack by a 1,000-strong mob of hardliners in February. No-one was charged with murder.

US-based Human Rights Watch said Sudjana’s sentence was appalling.

“It seems like the Ahmadiyah face blatant discrimination not just from Islamic militant mobs, but also from an Indonesian court,” said the group’s Elaine Pearson.

Sudjana was hit with a machete and almost had his hand severed during the attack, which pitted about 20 Ahmadiyah followers against more than 1,000 fanatics in the village of Cikeusik, west Java.

But the court ruled that he had disobeyed a police order to leave the scene, and had been filmed punching another man.

Sudjana told the AFP news agency that the verdict was embarrassing.

“I’m purely a victim who has been criminalised in my own country,” he said.

“There was no police order to evacuate and I hit the man because he entered our house of worship, calling us infidels, and ordered people to kill us. Isn’t it normal that I hit the man as an act of self-defence?“

Video footage of the attack shows crowds of hardliners beating a small group of Ahmadis as police watch.

So far 12 of the attackers have been found guilty of minor offences and sentenced to between three and six months.

Ahmadi Victim of Cikeusik Attack Jailed for 6 Months

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
NEWS
Ahmadi Victim of Cikeusik Attack Jailed for 6 Months
Heru Andriyanto | August 15, 2011

Serang, Banten. An Ahmadiyah member lashed out at the court that sentenced him to six months in jail on Monday for a deadly mob attack in which he and other sect members were targeted.

“I would like to say that this [verdict] could set a bad precedent because I, the victim, am sentenced in a trial held under political pressure,” Deden Sujana, the former head of security for the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI), said at the Serang District Court.

The court found Deden guilty of violent assault and disobeying police officers who had ordered him and about a dozen other Ahmadis to evacuate a home in the Cikeusik subdistrict of Pandeglang on Feb. 6. The house was surrounded by a mob of more than a thousand people who eventually attacked, killing three Ahmadis.

Deden also asked the judges why he had been convicted of violent assault, a charge that was not included in his indictment.

“I was treated the same way as the uncivilized murderers of my three friends. Where is the justice?” he said shortly after the hearing in the Banten capital.

Most of the 12 people convicted in the Cikeusik attack were sentenced last month to six months in jail by the same court.

“It’s a major failure for Indonesia, not providing protection for religious freedom. We are tired of people chanting Allahu Akbar and then killing others,” Deden said. “Religious freedom is granted by the Constitution: I have my religion, you have yours.”

The court said that Deden had ignored repeated warnings by the police to leave the home of local Ahmadiyah leader Suparman as about 1,500 people surrounded the house. Police told him they weren’t sure if they could control the mob.

“The defendant replied that he was there to secure the Ahmadiyah property and he told the officer that if the police could not cope with it, just leave, let the brawl erupt,” said the presiding judge, Sumartono.

The judges said Deden had attacked Idris bin Mahdani, one of the 12 men earlier convicted.

They said they had taken into account that “the defendant is in fact also a victim,” as he was seriously injured in the attack. The court cleared him of the more serious charge of inciting hatred.

Bonar Tigor Naipospos, deputy chairman of the Setara Institute for Freedom and Democracy, called the Cikeusik trials a failure of the justice system.

“The system has failed and has given rise to horizontal conflicts,” Bonar told the Jakarta Globe. “The Cikeusik hearings are ironic in that sense.”

Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, called the verdict “appalling” and said it “smacks of injustice.” She pointed out that the perpetrators of the deadly assault were given three- to six-month sentences.

“It seems like Ahmadiyah faces blatant discrimination, not just from Islamic militant mobs, but also from an Indonesian court,” Pearson said. “The outcome of these trials shows that the Indonesian government should clean up its justice system.”

Additional reporting by Anita Rachman & Ulma Haryanto

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe
URL: www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/senior-ahmadi.../459390

Senior Ahmadi Leader Sentenced to 6 Months Imprisonment

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
NEWS
Senior Ahmadi Leader Sentenced to 6 Months Imprisonment
Heru Andriyanto | August 15, 2011

Deden Sudjana, a member of the minority sect Ahmadiyah, consults with his lawyers at the Serang District Court on Monday. Deden is sentenced to six months for obstructing justice and failing to obey authorities during the violent attack on Ahmadiyah community in Cikeusik village, Serang, Banten on Feb. 6, 2011. (JG Photo/Heru Andriyanto)
Deden Sudjana, a member of the minority sect Ahmadiyah, consults with his lawyers at the Serang District Court on Monday. Deden is sentenced to six months for obstructing justice and failing to obey authorities during the violent attack on Ahmadiyah community in Cikeusik village, Serang, Banten on Feb. 6, 2011. (JG Photo/Heru Andriyanto)
A senior Amadiyah member was sentenced to six months imprisonment at the Serang District Court on Monday in relation to the violent mob attack that killed three other members of the minority sect on February 6.

Deden was convicted of inciting violence, obstruction of justice and disobedience after he refused police orders to evacuate when a group of Ahmadis were besieged by an angry mob at a home in Ciekusik, Banten.

He was among 20 Ahmadis who came to protect the home of an Ahmadiyah leader in Cikeusik, following rumors that locals wanted to forcibly disband the sect in the area.

The brutal attack involving about 1,500 hard-liners from surrounding villages left three Ahmadis dead and five, including Deden, seriously injured.

The Serang District Court found Deden guilty of a violent attack on Idris bin Madanim, one of the protestors, but it cleared him from the more serious charge of inciting hatred.

“We have considered the defendant is also a victim in the attack. He sustained injuries, his car was burned down. So we have delivered a sentence lower than what the prosecution is asking for,” said presiding judge Sumartono.

In response Deden told the court, his sentence could set a bad precedence.

“I, a victim, am sentenced because of political pressures.”

Copyright 2010 The Jakarta Globe
URL: www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/senior-ahmadi.../459390

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Heavier sentence sought for Ahmadi man

Jakarta Post, Indonesia
HEADLINESWed, 08/03/2011 8:00 AM
Heavier sentence sought for Ahmadi man
The Jakarta Post
Amid criticism and condemnation from human rights activists and foreign governments over the lenient jail sentences handed to 12 extremists involved in a mob riot that killed three Ahmadis, prosecutors at the Serang District Court sought a heavier sentence for an Ahmadi defendant accused of provoking the violence.

Prosecutors on Tuesday sought nine months’ imprisonment for Deden Darmawan Sudjana, a defendant implicated in the fatal attack perpetrated by a group of Muslim hard-liners against the minority Ahmadiyah sect in Cikeusik, Banten, on Feb. 6.

Deden is facing a longer jail term compared to 12 others indicted for participating in the riot, who were sentenced to between three and six months in jail. Prosecutors had previously sought jail sentences of between five and seven months.

Prosecutors said they could not charge the 12 defendants with murder because the death of the three Ahmadis was “an unanticipated incident” and “an inevitable consequence of an uncontrolled clash”.

“We have collected enough evidence. Deden was proven to have breached the Criminal Code Article 160 on inciting hatred and Article 351 (1) on physical abuse,” Serang Prosecutors’ Office head Jan Maringka said. “We found several sharp weapons in Deden’s cars. It showed that Deden had the intention to fight the attackers.”

Local Ahmadiyah congregation security chief Deden came to Cikeusik in Banten on Feb. 6 after a seven-hour journey from Jakarta, along with 16 other Ahmadis to secure a house. There were widespread rumors that a group of people planned to destroy the house and set it on fire because of Ahmadiyah’s “deviant” religious beliefs.

Media reports said that the Ahmadis carried three spears, a sack of stones, slingshots and straight-blade daggers inside two cars.

Jan said that Deden and other Ahmadis refused to leave even though the police had said that they would secure the house.

According to Antara news agency, Deden told the police: “Just let [the riot] happen. We will see a bloodbath here.”

Despite the fact that the Ahmadis were the victims of the attack, Jan said that “The Ahmadis provoked the riot. They had been warned before but refused to withdraw”.

Deden’s lawyer from the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute, Kiagus Ahmad Bella Sati, said that the nine-month sentence was unfair. “The attackers received five to seven months, while Deden, who is a victim, could face nine months,” he said.

Deden suffered a significant injury to his arm during the riot that required seven hours of surgery at Pertamina Central Hospital.

“The prosecutors want to give Deden a longer sentence. It shows that the prosecutors consider his crime more serious than the attackers who killed three people,” he said.

Ahmad admitted that his client said “just let [the riot] happen. We will see a bloodbath here”, but added that he had only said this in frustration over perceptions of insufficient police protection for the Ahmadis. The defense lawyer also presented experts who testified that Deden acted in self-defense.

The Cikeusik incident and its trial have put Indonesia under the spotlight for failing to protect its minorities. The light sentences handed to the perpetrators of the attacks triggered a storm of criticism from human rights defenders and the international community. (lfr)

Copyright © 2008 The Jakarta Post - PT Bina Media Tenggara. All Rights Reserved
URL: www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/08/03/heavier-sentence...man.html

Injured Ahmadi Faces Jail Time

Jakarta Globe, Indonesia
NEWS
Injured Ahmadi Faces Jail Time
Ulma Haryanto & Markus Junianto Sihalolo | August 03, 2011

Deden Sujana, head of security for the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) during his trial at Serang District Court. (Antara Photo/Asep Fathulrahman)
Deden Sujana, head of security for the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) during his trial at Serang District Court. (Antara Photo/Asep Fathulrahman)
Adding insult to injury, prosecutors at the Serang District Court on Tuesday recommended nine months in jail for an Ahmadi man critically injured in the deadly attack on members of the community in Cikeusik, Banten.

Prosecutors last month recommended prison sentences of between five months and seven months for 12 men accused of participating in the attack, from provoking violence to assault leading to death or injuries.

Last week, the court handed down sentences of only between three months and six months, prompting stern criticism from international and local human rights groups.

Deden Sujana, who was the head of security for the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) at the time, has been detained since May for allegedly inciting the Feb. 6 attack, during which three Ahmadiyah community members died.

“According to the prosecutors, the evidence proves that Deden prepared himself [for the clash],” Kiagus Ahmad, Deden’s lawyer, told the Jakarta Globe.

“The prosecutors seem to think that what Deden did was worse than the men who carried out the slaughter,” he added.

“When someone repeatedly hits someone with a rock and beats their lifeless body, that is slaughter.”

Some 1,500 people attacked the home of an Ahmadiyah community leader in Cikeusik in February, brutally killing three members of the Muslim sect, which some consider deviant.

Kiagus said prosecutors had neglected the fact that Deden was a victim in the incident.

“They said that the factors that helped reduce his sentence demand was his helpful attitude during the hearings and that he has never been convicted before,” he said.

He compared this to the prosecution’s argument for some of the attackers, namely Ujang Muhammad Arif, Muhammad bin Syarif, Endang bin Sidik and Muhammad Munir bin Basri.

“At the time, they said that the sentencing recommendation was light because they were religious leaders and there was a request from clerics and religious leaders in Banten to reduce their punishment,” he said.

Separately, Serang’s chief prosecutor, Jan Maringka, told the Jakarta Globe that his team was convinced that Deden had provoked the attack.

“He prepared weapons, spears, sickles and catapults. When the mob came, police warned him but he told them to step aside,” he said.

Jan said the mob had gone to Cikeusik for a communal prayer. “They didn’t come there to start a fight,” he added.

Meanwhile, Eva Kusuma Sundari, a member of the House of Representatives’ Commission III, which oversees legal affairs, said the disparity in the sentence demands was a clear indication that law enforcers had lost their impartiality.

Police and prosecutors had been taken hostage by the interests of the majority, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) lawmaker said, .

“Under the current situation, law enforcers have failed to ensure tolerance, respect for the law and human rights and respect for humanity,” she said.

Eva also criticized the lack of protection for the country’s minorities. “This will only weaken our democracy,” she said. “Just remember, the biggest challenge for democracy is to provide protection for minorities.”

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Prosecutors demand 9 months for Ahmadi defendant

Jakarta Post, Indonesia
NATIONALTue, 08/02/2011 7:07 PM
Prosecutors demand 9 months for Ahmadi defendant
The Jakarta Post
State prosecutors demanded Tuesday a nine months’ prison term for Deden Darmawan Sujana, a defendant in the bloody clash that took place between a group of Islamic hardliners and the minority Ahmadiyah sect in Cikeusik, Banten, on Feb. 6.

Serang Prosecutor’s Office head Jan Marinka said that Deden had allegedly breached Criminal Code Article 160 on inciting hatred and Article 351 (1) on physical abuse.

“We have enough evidence that show Deden’s intention to abuse others. He had prepared weapons inside his car. He also neglected the police’s order to get out of Cikeusik,” he said.

Deden is among 13 defendants involved in the clash, that left three Ahmadis dead and five injured, and became the only Ahmadi taken to trial. He is being tried separately.

The other 12 defendants have been sentenced to terms of between three and six months in prison, slightly lighter than the prosecutors’ demand for five to seven months, on July 28. Prosecutors declined to charge anyone with the murder of the Ahmadis, instead charging them with inciting hatred.(lfr)

Copyright © 2008 The Jakarta Post - PT Bina Media Tenggara. All Rights Reserved
URL: www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/08/02/prosecutors-demand...

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Ahmadiyah trial continues with extra security

Jakarta Post, Indonesia
ARCHIPELAGOThu, 07/07/2011 12:47 PM
Ahmadiyah trial continues with extra security
The Jakarta Post
A court case centered around a fatal attack on members of a religious minority group, Ahmadiyah, continued Thursday at Serang District Court in Banten, with the court set to hear prosecutors read out their sentence demands.

The hearing is being guarded with extra security, with personnel from the police and the military seen ready with a water cannon and antiriot vehicles in the court parking lot, kompas.com reported Thursday prior to the hearing.

Security screening has also been tightened for people wanting to enter the court.

Ambulances were also seen near the court building.

In February, about 1,500 people attacked members of the Ahmadiyah sect in Cikeusik, Banten, killing three.

Eleven defendants are being jointly tried for an assault causing death, inciting violence, mistreating others, participating in an assault and illegally possessing sharp weapons.

However, prosecutors have declined to charge anyone with the murder or manslaughter of the three Ahmadis.

Legal activists monitoring the trial including from the Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy (Elsam) previously said the prosecutor involved in the case had show a substandard performance. (rpt)

Copyright © 2008 The Jakarta Post - PT Bina Media Tenggara. All Rights Reserved
URL: www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/07/07/ahmadiyah-trial...

Thursday, June 9, 2011

After Banten attack, Ahmadi could face 6 years in prison

Jakarta Post, Indonesia
CITYThu, 06/09/2011 8:00 AM
After Banten attack, Ahmadi could face 6 years in prison
Hans David Tampubolon, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
A prosecutor is asking that Deden Sujana, a member of Jamaah Ahmadiyah Indonesia and one of the victims in a recent attack on Ahmadiyah followers in Cikeusik, Banten, be sentenced to six years in prison.

The attorney made the request during a trial at the Serang District Court in Banten on Wednesday.

Deden was accused of violating a clause in the Criminal Code (KUHP) on provocation.

The attorney said Deden also violated a KUHP clause on opposing police officers and a clause on minor abuse.

In February, a group of Ahmadis in Cikeusik were assaulted by a crowd of hard-line Islamists. Three Ahmadis were killed.

Deden, whose home and property were attacked by the hard-liners, suffered an injury to his arm.

In a video recording of the attack, Deden was seen punching an attacker. It is that footage that is the basis for the accusations that he was a provocateur.

Deden’s lawyer, Kiagus Ahmad, said the charges against his client were nothing but an effort to criminalize someone who was actually one of the victims.

“The masses ran amok in Deden’s backyard. According to the law, if someone wants to enter private property then he or she must ask for permission. The masses went in without any permission and forced Deden to throw a punch in self-defense,” Kiagus said.

Kiagus also rejected the prosecutor’s claim that Deden provoked nearby residents by bringing Ahmadis to the neighborhood.

“Deden heard reports that his house and private property would become the target of an attack. He then took the initiative to secure his assets. He cannot be blamed for doing that,” Kiagus said.

Kiagus also said that Deden had never chosen to disobey an order from a police officer.

“The police wanted my client to evacuate, but, my client did not do that because he saw that the preparations to secure the Ahmadis from the angry mob during the evacuation by the police officers was not enough,” he said.

Ahmadis have been the target of violent attacks from hard-line Islamic groups in Indonesia since 2005.

Ahmadiyah has existed in the country since the 1950s. The religious group, which says it is part of Islam, is considered heretical by some Islamic groups because it does not recognize Muhammad as the last prophet.

Copyright © 2008 The Jakarta Post - PT Bina Media Tenggara. All Rights Reserved
URL: www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/06/09/after...prison.html
 
^ Top of Page